top of page
CELE SQE1 模拟练习

时间:00:00:00

Jane Baker, a solicitor, is representing Mr. Smith in divorce proceedings. Mrs. Smith has initiated ancillary relief proceedings to have the matrimonial home transferred into her sole name. Jane becomes aware that the house was purchased by Mr. Smith with money obtained from illegal activities. 


What impact does the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 ("the Act") have in this scenario?

< 上一页

对/错

下一页 >

The case of Bowman v Fels clarified that steps taken in litigation, including the division of assets as per a court judgment, do not breach section 328 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002. The Court of Appeal concluded that such actions within a legal context do not amount to "arranging" under the Act. However, careful consideration must be given to ensure the litigation is not a sham designed for money laundering. If the proceedings are genuine, the solicitor is not in breach of the Act. 


Key Point: This question tests knowledge of section 328 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 and the legal interpretation provided by Bowman v Fels. It is crucial to understand how litigation steps are treated under the Act to avoid facilitating money laundering inadvertently.

收集问题

用户内容

学习 CELE SQE.png
来自 Lucky Lion 的 CELE SQE PASS 祝福_

人工智能内容

bottom of page