top of page
Review Your SQE 1 Practice Records

Examination Timing: 00H02M04S

The government has introduced a modified scheme of criminal injuries compensation, reducing the amount of compensation payable to victims in many cases. An alliance of trade unions representing people injured by criminal acts is considering challenging the decision. A group of representatives from one of the trade unions is concerned about whether it has sufficient interest (standing) to challenge the decision. 


Which option best advises the group?

< Previous

You have chosen the incorrect answer.
Your selected option:

Next >

Under the Supreme Court Act 1981, section 31(3), to be entitled to apply for judicial review, a person or entity must have a "sufficient interest" in the decision being challenged. This principle, often referred to as "standing," requires a direct, personal interest in the decision or action under challenge. Trade unions and similar organisations, which represent individuals who may be affected by a decision, can have sufficient interest to challenge a policy or decision on behalf of their members. In this scenario, the trade unions represent members who are potential victims of crimes of violence and are directly impacted by the modified scheme of criminal injuries compensation. Therefore, the unions have standing to challenge the new scheme. 


Key Point: The concept of standing in judicial review cases is interpreted liberally to allow organisations representing affected individuals to challenge decisions that impact their members, provided they have a direct and personal interest in the decision under challenge.

Collect Question

userContent

Study CELE SQE.png
CELE SQE PASS wishes from Lucky Lion_

Ai Content

bottom of page