CELE SQE

Review Your SQE 1 Practice Records

Examination Timing: 00H01M51S

Lucy is asked to help steward a parade in London. Unbeknownst to her, the organisers have failed to notify the police. When the authorities intervene, Lucy is held accountable as an organiser. She argues that she was merely a steward and had no role in planning the event. Which of the following statements best describes the legal position?

A. As a steward, technically Lucy is an organiser.

B. As a steward, Lucy would not be considered an organiser unless she had helped plan the event in advance.

C. As a steward, Lucy would not be considered an organiser unless she had helped plan the event in advance and had written confirmation of her status as organiser.

D. The organiser had no obligation to inform police.

E. The organiser has not committed a crime by failing to inform the police.

< Previous

You have chosen the incorrect answer.
Your selected option: C

Next >

The term 'organiser' is not explicitly defined in statute. However, case law such as Flockhart v Robinson [1950] suggests that those who direct the route or manage significant aspects of the event might be considered organisers. In general practice, it is the involvement in advance planning that typically determines who is an organiser. Since Lucy only acted as a steward without prior involvement in planning, she would not usually be classified as an organiser.

Key Point: The legal definition of an organiser can be context-dependent and is often influenced by prior involvement in planning and directing the event. Understanding roles and responsibilities in public order offences is crucial, as illustrated in public order statutes and relevant case law.

Collect Question

Criminal Law & PracticeUnit 1Chapter 9

userContent

Ai Content

Next Question