top of page
Review Your SQE 1 Practice Records

Examination Timing: 00H01M34S

John Williams, a pedestrian, is injured when a car driven by Emily Davis mounts the pavement and hits him. John sustains severe injuries and sues Emily for negligence. Emily argues that she suffered a sudden and unexpected heart attack, which caused her to lose control of the vehicle. 


Which one of the following statements is correct?

< Previous

You have chosen the correct answer
Your selected option: D

Next >

John must prove that Emily owed him a duty of care and breached that duty. In negligence claims, the claimant must establish that the defendant owed a duty of care, breached that duty, and caused the harm suffered. Option A is incorrect because liability is not automatic; it requires proof of negligence. Option B is incorrect as necessity is not a relevant defence in this context. Option C is incorrect as Emily’s defence would more appropriately be framed as an argument about foreseeability and causation rather than automatic absolution of liability. Option E is incorrect as contributory negligence would require evidence that John’s actions contributed to his injuries, which is unlikely in this scenario.


Key Point: This question focuses on the elements of negligence, specifically duty of care and breach, and the necessity for the claimant to prove these elements to establish liability.

Collect Question

userContent

Study CELE SQE.png
CELE SQE PASS wishes from Lucky Lion_

Ai Content

bottom of page