Timing: 00:00:00
Dr. Robert Williams, a university lecturer, had been rejected by law student Emma Parker after he made inappropriate advances towards her during the university's holiday party. In her final exams, Emma received the highest marks in all subjects except those marked by Dr. Williams, where she received the lowest marks. The exam board approved the marks, but Dr. Williams did not disclose that Emma's exam papers marked by him had not been sent to the external moderator.
What issue does the exam board's decision raise?
< Previous
T/F
Next >
This scenario raises an issue of illegality due to Dr. Williams' apparent bad faith. The exam board's decision is tainted by Dr. Williams' dishonest conduct, which suggests a lack of good faith. Such actions undermine the integrity of the decision-making process and can lead to judicial review on the grounds of bad faith.
Key Point: Judicial review can address issues of bad faith, where decisions are influenced by dishonest or improper motives. This principle ensures that administrative actions are taken in good faith, maintaining fairness and legality.
Collect Question
userContent
