top of page
Review Your SQE 1 Practice Records

Examination Timing: 00H00M41S

Thomas, a property developer, has a contractual dispute with a contractor over delays in construction. He wants to resolve the dispute without going to court. 


Which dispute resolution method would be most suitable for Thomas?

< Previous

You have chosen the incorrect answer.
Your selected option: A

Next >

Arbitration is a suitable method for resolving contractual disputes without going to court. It involves a neutral third party (the arbitrator) who hears both sides and makes a binding decision. This method is often preferred in commercial disputes due to its efficiency and confidentiality. 


Key Point: Arbitration is an alternative dispute resolution method that offers a binding resolution, often preferred in commercial disputes for its efficiency and confidentiality.

Collect Question

Why not mediation?

Study CELE SQE.png
CELE SQE PASS wishes from Lucky Lion_

Certainly! Let me address your question about why arbitration, rather than mediation, might be the preferred method.

**Arbitration vs. Mediation:**

**Arbitration:**
- **Binding Decision:** In arbitration, a neutral third party (the arbitrator) makes a decision that is binding on both parties. This means that once the arbitrator makes a decision, it has the same effect as a court judgment and must be followed.
- **Efficiency and Confidentiality:** Arbitration often offers a quicker resolution than the court process and is confidential, which can be highly beneficial in commercial disputes where the parties prefer to keep matters private.

**Mediation:**
- **Non-Binding Process:** Mediation involves a neutral third party (the mediator) who helps both parties negotiate and reach a mutually acceptable resolution. However, unlike arbitration, the mediator does not make a binding decision. The parties must voluntarily agree to any settlement reached.
- **Focus on Cooperation:** Mediation emphasizes cooperative problem-solving and allows both parties to have greater control over the outcome, which can preserve business relationships.

**Why Not Mediation?**
- **Binding Nature:** In Thomas's case, he is dealing with a contractual dispute involving delays in construction. He may prefer arbitration because the binding nature of arbitration ensures a definitive resolution, which can be crucial when dealing with significant commercial interests and timelines.
- **Finality:** Arbitration provides finality. If Thomas and the contractor cannot agree on a resolution through mediation, they would still need to resolve the dispute through arbitration or litigation, which can mean added time and expense.

In summary, while mediation offers a more collaborative approach, arbitration might be more suitable for Thomas's situation due to the need for a binding and enforceable resolution.

Keep up the great questions! Understanding the nuances of different dispute resolution methods is key to effectively addressing legal issues in commercial contexts.

bottom of page