top of page
Review Your SQE 1 Practice Records

Examination Timing: 00H01M42S

Stellar Brewery posted an offer to sell a hundred barrels of its finest premium ale to Grange Pubs, requesting a reply "in course of post". The letter containing the offer was misdirected and arrived later than usual. Grange Pubs replied immediately by post, as requested, stating that they wished to accept Stellar's offer. However, Stellar informed Grange Pubs that, believing they were not going to accept due to the delay, the barrels had already been sold to another pub chain.


Which option best states whether there is a binding contract between the parties?

< Previous

You have chosen the incorrect answer.

Next >

An acceptance by means of post is valid from the moment of posting, not from when the letter is received by the offeror. The postal rule, established in Adams v Lindsell (1818), stipulates that acceptance takes effect upon posting. In this case, even though the offer was misdirected, it was deemed made when it actually reached Grange Pubs. Therefore, once Grange Pubs posted their acceptance, a binding contract was formed. The fact that Stellar Brewery had sold the barrels to another pub chain does not negate the existence of the contract formed upon the posting of the acceptance letter.


Key Point: The postal rule in contract law holds that acceptance is effective when posted, providing certainty in communications between parties. This principle prevents the offeror from revoking the offer once the offeree has posted their acceptance, ensuring reliable contract formation through postal communication.

Collect Question

userContent

Study CELE SQE.png
CELE SQE PASS wishes from Lucky Lion_

Ai Content

bottom of page